Tag: quality

May 13, 2009   Posted by: Mike Merrill

The quality connection

Recently I wrote about quality rankings for automotive manufacturers and the perception of these rankings in the market. While the marketing teams at these companies must shoulder the burden to convince consumers about their products’ quality, there is a very real connection between product quality and configuration management.

In many industries where products have grown over time with constant additions of new features and flexibility to allow customers to build to order, the level of complexity is staggering. Often the number of configurations sold on an annual basis is surprisingly close to the total units sold for that same period. This “snowflake” situation is one of the worst possible scenarios in product complexity as each unit has its own signature. Obviously, the production of these products also requires flexibility in manufacturing. This may result in reduced use of automation, and often it leads to units being reconfigured where components installed during one step are either removed or modified in a later step due to a unique situation.

These one-off manufacturing processes open the door for product quality issues due to fewer controls during production. Put simply, if I can reduce the number of different things that must be done during production I should be able to do those things better.

So product management teams have direct input on product quality via product complexity. Managing the product option mix to reduce the overall number of configurations can promote the increased quality that all manufacturers are looking for.

Comments Off
May 6, 2009   Posted by: Mike Merrill

Extending the product configuration to gain insight

One of the most important components in choice complexity is the product configuration itself, the mixture of product options that give a product its unique signature. Obviously the typical product orderable options are needed to analyze the complexity of a product, but other more abstract options can offer surprising insights into product and customer behaviors.

A typical car configuration has options such as sedan, V6 engine, automatic, blue, cloth, AM/FM/CD, sunroof. But more abstract items can be recorded along with these to offer more insight. Sales type can be recorded to analyze what types of product configurations sell better in promotional sales events as opposed to normal sales transactions. An attribute to record an extended factory warranty option may provide new ideas for packaging options together with additional warranty services that customers are moving towards.

continue reading »

Comments Off
April 29, 2009   Posted by: Russ Caldwell

Stop product complexity at the door

In any manufacturing company that builds configurable products, there is a lot of discussion around what product complexity is. What’s interesting is that when times are good and there are lots of sales, the discussion is usually around how to simplify or streamline with the goal to sell more product even faster, that complexity is keeping sales from going even higher. In bad times, the discussion typically moves to how complexity is causing undue stress on the supply chain, creating problems with parts forecasting, quality and finished goods inventory.

Rarely do these discussions end with participants really agreeing about exactly what complexity is or how to reduce it. Solutions are attempted with internal projects like SKU reduction and part number reduction initiatives driven by Six Sigma teams that mean well and do good work, but usually are chasing the tail of the complexity dog, rather than leashing it for good and guiding it to higher profits, lower forecasting errors, even shorter sales cycles.

continue reading »

Comments Off
April 27, 2009   Posted by: John Mariotti

Optimization is the big win – but getting started is key

When I started studying complexity and realized the huge adverse impact it was having on companies, I was determined to “find it and get rid of it.” There are many places where that formula will lead to big improvements in everything – profits, service, quality and more. More and more companies are discovering how to do this. In some cases it is pretty simple. Just having the courage of their convictions that it will make things better is all that stands in the way of eliminating complexity.

Well, I found that is not completely true – at least not all the time. There are some situations where what seems to be a simple complexity elimination process turns out to be quite a bit more… complex! The real issue is not just complexity reduction. It is “optimization” of complexity.  Get rid of the wasteful part and structure processes to use the right level of complexity.

continue reading »

April 24, 2009   Posted by: Mike Merrill

Is quality really important?

Seems like it’s almost fashionable to kick the three U.S. automakers these days, and I rarely hear people mention U.S. built as one of their first choices. Yet people almost always cite reliability as one of their most important criteria for buying a vehicle.

The most recent J.D. Power and Associates rankings show that 2 of the top 5 highest-ranked brands for vehicle dependability are from U.S. automakers. Two other U.S. brands had top rankings in other vehicle segments. It seems that many foreign makers have a perception of quality that is based on past success or marketing. Manufacturing of products in the U.S. has seen a steady rise in quality over the past 10-15 years; the perception in the marketplace should keep pace. If nothing else, the data points out that buyers should consider U.S. brands and not jump to conclusions on outdated results.

Comments Off